CFNM TV is the sister site of CFNM.net which focuses on videos. CFNM means clothed female, nude male - that's the fetish this sites revolves around. This is a femdom site in which bad guys get dominated by powerful women who inspect & play with the nude guy's body.
One thing that was apparent to me right away that the site positions itself as a kind of cinema with a limited amount of videos showing at a time. Additionally have an archive with 80 older movies which are available permanently. The newest updates are only available for about 2 months, which I don't like. There are usually about 4-5 long movies that are new and split into 6-7 minute long parts, they add two of these parts every week as updates along with some photos.
The content is pretty good, they have very creative storylines. The actors and actresses are from England, and some of the stories are rather British too, with English school girls & teachers, or servants & lords at a manor. Femdom & tiny dick ridiculing is quite big here, there is touching, spanking, wanking with lots of laughter and nasty speech by the women. There's even the girls fucking the guy with a strap-on.
Video quality is below HD but it's okay. The photos don't seem to be too important on this site, I think they are quickly taken during the video shoots, and quality is medium.
The site's interface is quite bad, it looks very dated and it's quite chaotic. The web video player doesn't support fast-forwarding, and photos aren't downloadable in ZIP files. The good news is that MP4 is available and the site works okay on mobiles too.
The price is a bit steep. And as I said, I don't like the fact that they remove updates. But apart from those two negative things, the site has a pretty nice library of Femdom CFNM with 95 scenes (counting multi-part updates as one scene). And these scenes are creative and exclusive, so the site is still worth it for the real fans of the niche.
|mp4 wmv||960 x 540 px||2000 kbps|
|1100 x 619 px|
|One month||$41.90||rebills at $36.90 / month|
|this full review||Apr 20, 2015||70/100|